About this Journal Publication ethics Editorial Board Editorial Council Editorial Office For the Authors Contacts
English

News feeds

Journal in Databases

eLIBRARY.RU - ÍÀÓ×ÍÀß ÝËÅÊÒÐÎÍÍÀß ÁÈÁËÈÎÒÅÊÀ

Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Main arrow Archive of previous Issues arrow ¹2 2011 (18) arrow New criteria of yield efficiency of academic and high school medical science in Russia
New criteria of yield efficiency of academic and high school medical science in Russia Print
Tuesday, 31 May 2011

V.I. Starodubov, N.G. Kurakova, L.A. Tsvetkova
Federal Public Health Institute, Moscow

The resume. A recently launched structural modernization of generating of medical knowledge in RF is under discussion in this study. The study shows that the following criteria of assessment of yield efficiency of educational and scientific establishments are viable from now on: internationally acknowledged scientific research results, publication activity of individual researchers, as well as of the whole staff community, activities of research and educational institutes in commercialization of products obtained from their intellectual property. Scientific metric measures of the Strategy of Innovative Development till 2020 were also discussed in this study. New requirements of the Supreme Skills Certification Commission to publications of fellows were subjected to analysis as well.

It is noted that a modern model of funding scientific research in Russia will take into consideration the above mentioned criteria. For this reason, bibliometric measures of research activity of scientific research institutes has become a factor of capitalization.

This study depicted certain features in Russian horizon of medical researches differing it from the other countries, and evaluated the availability and comprehension of originally Russian language scientific resource for the global medical community, also assessed rating of scientific establishments of Russia worldwide, postulated the signs of peer-reviewed journals in Russia. Recommendations for enhanced availability and cited frequency were elaborated for Russian publications on issues of medicine and public health.

It is stated that upon the results of assessment of the efficiency of educational and research centers through the period of 2011-14, a reduction in number of 10-15% of such establishments of scientific research sphere (if it turns out that they are not really committed to scientific activity) with subsequent changing of the activity profile is to be fulfilled. And more than 20% of them are to be partially intra-restructured on the way of eliminating scientifically inefficient divisions. These potential perturbations being in store, every research or educational center should reconsider the importance of an active publication strategy.

Key words: medical journals in Russia , bibliometric measures, publication activity, cited frequency.

References

  1. Arefev PG. Predstavleniye rossiyskoy nauchnoy periodiki v vedushchikh mezhdunarodnykh bibliograficheskikh i analiticheskikh bazakh dannykh i RINTs [Russian scientific periodic literature in major international bibliographic and analytical databases. Russian index of researchers being cited. Scientific Journal in 2010 Russia]. In: Proceedings of Conference «Nauchnyy zhurnal v Rossii 2010». Moscow 2010 Apr 26. [cited 2010 Dec 25]. Available from: http://elibrary.ru/projects/publconf/publ2010/event_conf_10_program.asp
  2. Enikeeva A. Srednyaya aspirantura po bolnitse. Nauka i tekhnologii Rossii. [Fellowship in a hospital. Science and technology in Russia]. 2010 [cited 2010 Dec 25]. Available from: http://strf.ru/material.aspx?CatalogId=221&d_no=35896
  3. Indeks tsitirovaniya rossiyskikh uchenykh «Kto est kto v rossiyskoy nauke [Russian index of researchers being cited - who is who in Russian science] [Internet]. [cited 2010 Dec 25]. Available from: http://www.scientific.ru/whoiswho/whoiswho.html.
  4. Kasimova RG. Bibliometricheskiye bazy dannykh kak instrument nauchnogo menedzhmenta [Bibliometric database as a tool of scientific management]. Naukovedenie 2002;(4):187-194.
  5. Korpus ekspertov po estestvennym naukam [Experts corps on natural sciences] [Internet] [cited 2010 Dec 25]. Available from: http://expertcorps.ru/science/about.
  6. Markusova VA, Ivanov VV, Varshavskiy AE. Bibliometricheskiye pokazateli rossiyskoy nauki i RAN (1997-2007) [Bibliometric indicators of Russian science. Russian Academy of sciences]. Vestnik RAN 2009;79(7):483-491.
  7. Markusova VA. Informatsionnye resursy dlya monitoringa rossiyskoy nauki [Information sources for monitoring of Russian science]. Vestnik RAN 2005;75(7):607-612.
  8. Muraveva M. Spros na innovatsionnoye myshleniye [Demand for innovative mentality] [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2010 Feb 25]. Available from: http://www.strf.ru/material.aspx?CatalogId=221&d_no=36472
  9. Proekt Strategii innovatsionnogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2020 goda. Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii [Draft strategy for innovative development of the Russian Federation till 2020]. Moscow, 2010. [cited 2010 Dec 25]. Available from: http://www.economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/innovations/doc20101231_016
  10. Starodubov VI, Kurakova NG, Tsvetkova LA, Markusova VA. Rossiyskaya meditsinskaya nauka v zerkale mezhdunarodnogo i otechestvennogo tsitirovaniya [Russian medcial science seen through the mirror of being cited internationally and domestically]. Menedzher zdravookhraneniya 2011;(1):6-20.
  11. Sterligov I. Silnye i slabye napravleniya rossiyskoy nauki. Bibliometricheskiy analiz [Strong and weak points of Russian science: Bibliometric analysis] [Internet]. [2010 Mar 19; cited 2010 Dec 25]. Available from: http://blogs.strf.ru/blog/20.html
  12. Chechel A, Tovkaylo M. Effektivnost gosraskhodov na NIOKR prakticheski ravna nulyu [Efficiency of state expenditure on scientific research and design work tasks is equal to zero]. Vedomosti 17.01.2011
  13. Ranking of Research Institutions SIR World Report 2010 Health Sciences [Internet]. (2007). SCImago Journal & Country Rank. [Retrieved December 2010; cited 2010 Dec 27]. Available from: http://www.scimagojr.com
  14. Visser M., Moed H. Comparing Web of Science and SCOPUS on a paper-by-paper basis. In: Excellence and emergence. A new challenge for combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Paper presented at the 10th S&T International Conference. 2008. P. 23–25

Views: 23162

Be first to comment this article

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Comment:

Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Thursday, 09 June 2011 )
Next >
home contact search contact search