About this Journal Publication ethics Editorial Board Editorial Council Editorial Office For the Authors Contacts
English

News feeds

Journal in Databases

eLIBRARY.RU - ÍÀÓ×ÍÀß ÝËÅÊÒÐÎÍÍÀß ÁÈÁËÈÎÒÅÊÀ

Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Main arrow Archive of previous Issues arrow ¹4 2011 (20) arrow Determinants of relationships to preservation of their health of successful students
Determinants of relationships to preservation of their health of successful students Print
Friday, 02 December 2011

Sabgayda T.P.1, Sergievskaya A.L.2
1
Federal public health institute, Moscow
2Representation of the Oxford Russia Fund (UK), Moscow

Summary. Self-preservation behavior of successful young people, fellows of Oxford Russia Fund, was analyzed. The hypothesis of AS Skorobogatov (2010) was tested, according to which, care about health is depended from the economic value of man. That is the next: in a group of persons of the same age with the same economic value should be similar behavior with regard to health.

The study seeks to identify the social determinants of attitudes towards the preservation of health of the best students of the best classic universities in the country. Relation to health was determined based on a specially designed questionnaire.

Four groups of students with different perceptions of health status identified among homogeneous population by social status, type and level of education, focus on career and success, active life position (2002 people). We compared the respondents' views on the health between the groups. Relation to disease prevention were compared not only in the context of the selected four groups, but also in depending on the financial condition of the parental family, the type of work and level of parental education.

It was found that among the analyzed groups of young people self-preservation behavior differs significantly. The sense of health state in students change proportionally with their optimistic disposition, physical activity, sociability and involvement in social activities, resistance to the problems of life. Where the ratio of students to health maintenance and preventive measures does not vary linearly.

It is shown that the motivation of students to the preservation of health is determined by parental income families, the status and self-employed father, educational level of mother, presence of supporting the organization of health care. On that basis, it is concluded that the expected output from human capital is not the leading factor in shaping the behavior of the individual in terms of maintaining health. It was proposed to determine the human capital not only by the amount of money spent on education and training, but also through character traits of individuals as regards the prospects for employment benefits.

The urgency distribution among population data on the economic viability of preventive measures was determined. Based on the results it is concluded that as the health category is an abstract value for students and it is not associated with the concept of success in university, so there is no motivation to actively preserve health even among the intellectual elite of the future society.

Keywords. Self-preservation behavior, the correlation of the state's spending on health and human capital, health behavior, the motivation to preserve the health, commitment to prevent, the formation of the value of health, education responsibility for personal health, character traits of individuals as regards the prospects for employment benefits.

 

References

  1. Avraamova Ye.M., Kulagina Ye.V. Obrazovatelnyy potentsial naseleniya kak resurs innovatsionnoy ekonomiki [Educational potential of the population as a resource for innovation economy]. Spero: Ekspertiza, rekomendatsii, obzory 2009;(11):29-40.
  2. Babenko A.I. K metodologii sotsialno-gigiyenicheskikh issledovaniy [On methodology of social and sanitary researches]. Problemy sotsialnoy gigiyeny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny 2004;(6):3-4.
  3. Bekker G.S. Ekonomicheskiy vzglyad na zhizn [Economic outlook on life]. Vestnik SPbGU 1993. Seriya 5. Ekonomika; Issue 3. P. 125-138.
  4. Braun Â.Dzh., Rusinova N.L. Sotsialnyye neravenstva i zdorovye [Ñîöèàëüíûå íåðàâåíñòâà è çäîðîâüå]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii 1999;(1):101-115.
  5. Bubnova S.S. Sistemnyy podkhod k issledovaniyu psikhologii individualnosti [System approach to researches in the psychology of individuality]. Moscow: Yanus-K; 2002. 52 p.
  6. Burtsev V.A. Formirovaniye polozhitelnogo tsennostnogo otnosheniya podrostkov k zdorovyu i zdorovomu obrazu zhizni na osnove sportizatsii fizicheskogo vospitaniya [Formation of positive value attitude to health and healthy life style in adolescents on the base of sport development]. [PhD. Thesis]. Cheboksary; 2007. 24 p.
  7. Demina L.D., Ralnikova I.A. Psikhicheskoye zdorovye i zashchitnyye mekhanizmy lichnosti [Mental health and individual’s protection mechanisms]. Barnaul: Altayskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet; 2000. 123 p.
  8. Zhuravleva I.V. Povedencheskiy faktor i zdorovye naseleniya. Zdorovye cheloveka v usloviyakh NTR. Metodicheskiye aspekty [Behavior factor and population health. Person’s health under conditions of scientific and technical revolution. Methodological aspects]. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1989. 72 p.
  9. Zhuravleva I.V. Zdorovye naseleniya kak mezhdistsiplinarnaya problema: Stanovleniye sotsiologii zdorovya [Population health as an interdisciplinary problem: formation of health sociology]. In: Sotsiologiya v Rossii.. Yadov V.A., editor. Moscow: ISRAN; 1998. P. 484-489.
  10. Zhuravleva I.V. Otnosheniye k zdorovyu individa i obshchestva [Attitude to health in individuals and community]. Moscow: Nauka; 2006. 238 p.
  11. Zaks L. Statisticheskoye otsenivaniye [Statistical assessment]. Transleter Varygin V.N.; Adler Yu.P., Gorskiy V.G., editors. Moscow: Statistika; 1976. 597 p.
  12. Zdorovye-21: osnovy politiki dostizheniya zdorovya dlya vsekh v Yevropeyskom regione VOZ [Health-21: Health for all policy in WHO European region]. European health for all series N6. Copenhagen. 1999. 310 p.
  13. Ivakhnenko G.A. Zdorovye moskovskikh studentov: analiz samosokhranitelnogo povedeniya [Health of Moscow students: analysis of self-saving behavior]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya 2006;(5):78-81.
  14. Ilinskiy I.V. Investitsii v budushcheye: obrazovaniye v innovatsionnom vosproizvodstve [Investments in the future: education in innovation reproduction]. St. Petersburg: SPbUEF; 1996. 30 p.
  15. Kovaleva A.A. Samosokhranitelnoye povedeniye v sisteme faktorov, okazyvayushchikh vliyaniye na sostoyaniye zdorovya [Self-saving behavior in the system of factors providing an impact on health status]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii 2008;11(2):179-191.
  16. Kozina G.Yu. Zdorovye v tsennostnom mire studentov [Health in the world of students’ values]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya 2007;(9):147-149.
  17. Kruglyakova I.P., Vaganova L.I. Vzaimosvyaz lichnostno-kharakterologicheskikh osobennostey studentov i ikh obraza zhizni [Interrelation between students’personal peculiar features and their life style]. Proceedings of the 6th international scientific-practical Conference “Zdorovye i Obrazovaniye v XXI veke”. Moscow; 2005. P. 258.
  18. Kudrina Ye.A. Nauchnoye obosnovaniye printsipov profilaktiki khronicheskikh zabolevaniy na urovne semi [Scientific foundations of the principles of chronic disease prevention at a family level]: [PhD. Thesis]. Moscow;. 2008. 32 p.
  19. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N., Chirkov V.I., Lyu Ts. Kulturno-psikhologicheskiye osobennosti otnosheniya k zdorovyu russkikh i kitayskikh studentov [Culture and psychological features of attitude to health in Russian and Chinese students]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal 2007;(4):64-74.
  20. Maksimova T.M. Sotsialnyy gradiyent v formirovanii zdorovya naseleniya [Social gradient in formation of population health]. Moscow: PER SE; 2005. 240 p.
  21. Maksimova T.M., Belov V.B., Rogovina A.G. Nekotoryye osobennosti obraza zhizni v gruppakh lits s razlichnymi tsennostnymi oriyentatsiyami [Some specific features of the life style in groups of individuals with various value orientations]. Problemy sotsialnoy gigiyeny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny 2004;(3):8-11.
  22. Martsinkevich V.I. USA: chelovecheskiy faktor i effektivnost ekonomiki [The USA: human factor and economy efficiency]. Moscow: Nauka; 1991. 239 p.
  23. Osnovy politiki dostizheniya zdorovya dlya vsekh v Yevropeyskom regione VOZ. Obnovleniye 2005 g. Yevropeyskaya seriya po dostizheniyu zdorovya dlya vsekh [Health for all policy in WHO European region]. Updated edition 2005. European health for all series. 2005 ¹7. 98 p.
  24. Polunina N.V., Popov V.V. Differentsirovannyy podkhod k formirovaniyu pokazateley zdorovya podrastayushchego pokoleniya [Differentiate approach to formation of indicators for younger generation’s health]. Obshchestvennoye zdorovye i profilaktika zabolevaniy 2005;(1):16-20.
  25. Popova I.P. Dinamika sostoyaniya zdorovya, izmeryayemogo na baze GHQ: tendentsii i sotsialnyye faktory (opyt analiza dannykh longityudnogo oprosa) [Dynamics of health status measured on the base of GHQ: tendencies and social factors (experience in analyzing the longitude inquiry data]. Zdravookhraneniye Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2006;(3):23-27.
  26. Prokhorov B.B. Sotsialnaya stratifikatsiya obshchestva i zdorovye naseleniya [Social stratification of the community and population health]. Problemy prognozirovaniya 2009;(3):112-133.
  27. Ryvkina R.V. Sotsialnyye neravenstva v postsovetskoy Rossii [Social inequalities in post-Soviet Russia]. Sotsialno-gumanitarnyye znaniya 2005;(3):85-86.
  28. Skorobogatov A.S. Zavisimost mezhdu chelovecheskim kapitalom i samosokhranitelnym povedeniyem [Interrelation between human capital and self-saving behavior]. Terra economicus 2010;8(4):20-36.
  29. Tapilina V.S. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskiy status i zdorovye naseleniya [Social and economic status and population health]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya 2004;(3):126-137.
  30. Fedorenko N.P. Rossiya na rubezhe vekov [Russia on a boundary of centuries]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Ekonomika»; 2003. P. 86-116
  31. Shabunova A.A. Obshchestvennoye i individualnoye zdorovye v sovremennoy Rossii: sostoyaniye i dinamika [Public and individual health in present-day Russia: status and dynamics]. [PhD. Thesis]. Moscow; 2011. 30 p.
  32. Shilova L.S. Razlichiya v samosokhranitelnom povedenii muzhchin i zhenshchin [Differences in self-saving behavior in men and women]. In: Zdorovye cheloveka v usloviyakh NTR. Borodin Yu.I., editor. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1989. 80 p.
  33. Shilova L.S. Problemy transformatsii sotsialnoy politiki i individualnykh oriyentatsii po okhrane zdorovya [Problems with transformation of the social policy and individual orientation for health protection]. In: Sotsialnyye konflikty: ekspertiza, prognozirovaniye, tekhnologii razresheniya. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RAN; 1999. P. 86-114.
  34. Shilova L.S. O strategii povedeniya lyudey v usloviyakh reformy zdravo-okhraneniya [About persons’ behavior policy under conditions of health care reforms]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya 2007;(9):102-109.
  35. Shinyayeva O.V., Padiarova A.B. Sotsialnoye neravenstvo i zdorovye molodogo pokoleniya rossiyan [Social inequality and young generation health]. Ulyanovsk: UlGTU; 2010. 168 p.
  36. Attanasio O, Emmerson C. Mortality, Health Status, and Wealth. Journal of the European Economic Association 2003;1(4):821-850.
  37. Clark J, Kim V, Poulton R, Milne V. The Role of Low Expectations in Health and Education Investment and Hazardous Consumption. Canadian Journal of Economics 2006;39(4):1151-1172.
  38. Fuchs VR. Time Preference and Health: an Exploratory Study. In: Victor R. Fuchs, ed., Economic aspects of health. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1982. P. 93-120.
  39. Grossman M. The Relationship Between Schooling and Health. Eastern Economic Journal 2008;34:281-292.
  40. Mechanic D. Mental health and social policy: initiatives for the 1980 s. Health Aff (Millwood) 1985;4(1):75-88.
  41. Steptoe A, Wardle J Pollard TM, Canaan L. Davies GJ. Stress, social support and health-related behavior: a study of smoking, alcohol consumption and physical exercise. J. Psychosom. Res. 1996;41:171-180.
  42. Wardle J, Steptoe A. Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2003;57(6):440-443.

Views: 18262

Be first to comment this article

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Comment:

Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 05 November 2013 )
< Prev   Next >
home contact search contact search