About this Journal Publication ethics Editorial Board Editorial Council Editorial Office For the Authors Contacts

News feeds

Journal in Databases

eLIBRARY.RU - ═└ËÎ═└▀ Ţ╦┼╩Ďđ╬══└▀ ┴╚┴╦╚╬Ď┼╩└

Google Scholar

Google Scholar

For authors' attention

Publication is free of charge

In aims to provide interconnection of publications in international scientific journals using Digital Object Identification - DOI, our editorial office incorporated the journal "Social aspects of population health" into international reference system CrossRef.

Since 2016 DOI will be assigned to all scientific articles published in our journal free of charge.

Also DOI will be assigned to all articles published in 2014 and 2015 free of charge as well
Main arrow Archive of previous Issues arrow ╣4 2012 (26) arrow Sociological researches as healthcare quality indicator in constant preventive surveillance of perinatal pathology
Sociological researches as healthcare quality indicator in constant preventive surveillance of perinatal pathology Print
Monday, 08 October 2012

V. I. Starodubov1 , V. S. Stupak3, O. M. Filkina2, O. A. Senkevich3, E. A. Vorobyova2
1 Federal research institute for public health organization and informatics, Moscow
2 Maternity and childhood research institute of Ivanovo named after V.N. Gorodkov, Ivanovo
3 Perinatal center, Khabarovsk

Summary. In perinatal pathology, just an sociological survey can be a unique tool for the assessment of healthcare satisfaction range in the smallest patients as direct consumers of medical services. Such a survey can readily constitute an important indicator of the grade of healthcare in constant preventive surveillance of perinatal pathology.

Aim: to assess healthcare satisfaction range in perinatal patients by way of an opinion poll of their parents and of involved medical staff.

Materials and Methods: medical sociological survey was performed on the materials of "Perinatal center" in the city of Khabarovsk based on results of completed quiestionnaires of 1997 respondents. The questionnaire included scoring; the scoring results were statistically processed on routine basis.

Results: Survey into the opinions of involved medical employees and corresponding parents really proved to be an important and unique techniques to establish healthcare satisfaction in perinatal preventive surveillance. The completed questionnaires, when processed, revealed a rather low awareness of the parents in legal issues of health protection, misunderstanding of certain notions, such as responsible parental attitude, unskillful contraception habits, evasive position for opportune appointments with centers for birth control in families, and ignorance of limited access of the population to quite a number of measures in perinatal pathology. Revealed factors are considered to be significant for organization of healthcare for parturient women and newborns.

Conclusions: Comparative analysis of opinions of medical employees and the parents demonstrated only but a partial coincidence in many of the questions. In general, a low satisfaction of healthcare in perinatal pathology was established through the opinions of the parents, concerning mainly the quality grade of prevention measures at a given medical facility. Prevention measures could be improved with the elevated skills and morals of medical staff. Persuading the parents as concerns the adequacy of prescriptions and urging them to follow the recommended course are also of importance. Parentĺs devotion to solving health problems of the newborns at every stage of the postnatal development is considered to favour the formation of healthcare-wise behaviour of the small patients. This healthcare satisfaction survey is considered in this study as a direct indicator as to the quality grade of delivered medical care. Such a survey can be helpful in the evaluation of the prevention service in perinatal pathology at a regional level as a whole. It also can serve as a guidance as to certain directions of optimization of this service.

Keywords. Healthcare employees; patients' parents; health care quality; satisfaction with medical services; sociological surveys; perinatal pathology; continuous preventive maintenance.


  1. Aleksandrova O.Yu., Suslin S.A. Sovershenstvovaniye kontrolya kachestva meditsinskoy pomoshchi v usloviyakh OMS [Improving monitoring of the quality of medical care in MHI]. O meditsinskom strakhovanii 2009;(2):10-12.
  2. Vishnyakov N.I., Petrova N.G., Balokhina S.A., et al. Mneniye patsiyentov kak vazhnyy kriteriy kachestva meditsinskoy pomoshchi [Patientsĺ assessment as an important criterion of the quality of medical care]. Problemy upravleniya zdravookhraneniyem 2009;45(2):43-45.
  3. Goncharova Ye.Yu., Rykova I.V., Starchenko A.A., et al. Nezavisimaya ekspertiza kak instrument vliyaniya strakhovykh meditsinskikh organizatsiy na pokazateli deyatelnosti ispolnitelnoy vlasti subyektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sfere zdravookhraneniya [An independent examination as a tool of influence of health insurance corporations on health care indicators of executive activity in the RF subjects]. O meditsinskom strakhovanii 2011;(23):9-18.
  4. Morozov P.N. Otsenka patsiyentami deyatelnosti statsionarnykh lechebno-profilakticheskikh uchrezhdeniy (na primere Klinicheskogo tsentra MMA im. I.M. Sechenova) [Patientsĺ assessment of in-patient health care facilities (by an example of I.M. Sechenov MMA Clinical center)]. Problemy upravleniya zdravookhraneniyem 2005;36(2):78-83.
  5. Naberezhnaya Zh.B., Serdyukov A.G. Analiz udovletvorennosti bolnykh meditsinskoy pomoshchyu v statsionarakh [Analysis of patientsĺ satisfaction with medical care in hospitals]. Glavvrach 2005;(3):49-53.
  6. Ob obyazatelnom meditsinskom strakhovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: federalnyy zakon ot 29.11.1010 ╣ 326-FZ [On Mandatory Health Insurance in the Russian Federation: the Federal Law of 29.11.1010 ╣ 326-FZ]. Rossiyskaya gazeta 2010, 3 dekabrya, federalnyy vypusk ╣5353.
  7. Petrova N.G., Balokhina S.A., Martirosyan M.M., et al. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya kak neotyemlemyy instrument upravleniya na sovremennom etape [Sociological studies as an essential management tool in the present times]. Problemy upravleniya zdravookhraneniyem 2008;41(4):19-25.
  8. Rusinova N.L., Panova L.V., Burmykina O.N. Prediktory udovletvorennosti potrebiteley uslugami pervichnogo zdravookhraneniya [Predictors of patientsĺ satisfaction with primary health care service]. Sotsiologiya meditsiny 2006;9(2):24-30.
  9. Trofimov V.V. Struktura kachestva meditsinskikh uslug: metodologicheskiye, metodicheskiye i mediko-organizatsionnyye aspekty ekspertizy [The structure of medical service quality: methodological, methodical and health organization aspects of expertise]. Arkhangelsk: Izdatelskiy tsentr SGMU. 2007. 260 p.
  10. Khabriyev R.U., I.F. Seregina. O rezultatakh sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya po otsenke dostupnosti i kachestva meditsinskoy pomoshchi naseleniyu [Results of sociological study on assessing accessibility and quality of medical care to population]. Zdravookhraneniye 2007;(6):31-43.

Views: 13277

Be first to comment this article

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.

Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Monday, 15 October 2012 )
Next >
home contact search contact search