About this Journal Publication ethics Editorial Board Editorial Council Editorial Office For the Authors Contacts
English

News feeds

Journal in Databases

eLIBRARY.RU - ÍÀÓ×ÍÀß ÝËÅÊÒÐÎÍÍÀß ÁÈÁËÈÎÒÅÊÀ

Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Main arrow Archive of previous Issues arrow ¹5 2014 (39) arrow Approaches to study competences of employees of scientific medical organizations: a brief literature review
Approaches to study competences of employees of scientific medical organizations: a brief literature review Print
Wednesday, 26 November 2014

Altunin A.V.
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

Abstract. Analysis of approaches to evaluate professional competence is substantiated by the worldwide trends towards standard evaluation of work quality and related changes in administrative requirements to specialists.

Aim. To determine and analyze main approaches to study professional competence of staff of scientific medical organizations.

Method: theoretical literature analysis.

Results: The review identified the following four main approaches: American approach, based on understanding competence through observed behavior and its efficiency; European approach, with a focus on functions and tasks of professional activity; expert approach, studying competence through review of experts’ characteristics; and national (Russian) approach, initially limited to Knowledge paradigm and is being currently used to illustrate the integrated model for understanding this problem.

Four main types of competences: fundamental competence that is necessary for developing professional adaptiveness of a specialist; nuclear one that includes functional labor aspects; professional competence, reflecting technological aspect of professional activity; and over-professional competence related to the subject of activity and its social interaction.

Creativity is regarded as an integral factor for other competences. The article describes things in common across the described approaches and classifications of competences as well as development of the target indicator of quality of professional activity of scientific medical workers – their publication activity.

Scope of application: results could be used to develop methodological basis for centers of competence development that are necessary for the most efficient transition of the national medical science into the innovative competence approach.

Keywords: Competence, expertise, qualification, professional activity, competence approach, information and communication technologies; quality management, publication activity.

References

  1. Altunin A.V., Zhilyaev A.G. Assessment of the risks in development of disadaptation in young people with an increased level of self-realization. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. 2012; 95(15): 247-257. (In Russian).
  2. Altunin A.V., Psychological features of young people with an increased level of self-realization in condition of intensive personal activity. Cand.Sci. Psych [thesis]. Moscow. 2012. 21 p. (In Russian).
  3. Andreeva V.V. Development and realization of the system for multi-level training of specialists in information technologies: Dr.Sci.Ed [dissertation]. Tol'yatti. 2004. 337 p. (In Russian).
  4. Balashova V.F. Concepts of “competence” and “professional skill” as basic components of competence approach to education. Fizicheskaya kul'tura: vospitanie, obrazovanie, trenirovka. 2008; (5): 59-63. (In Russian).
  5. Blinov V.I., Voloshina I.A., Esenina E.Yu., Leybovich A.N., Novikov P.N. Dictionary of terms of Russian contemporary professional education. Issue 1. Moscow: FIRO; 2010. [Internet] [cited 2014 Feb 14]. Available from: http://www.firo.ru/?page_id=985 (In Russian).
  6. Volodina N. A competency model – it is not difficult. [Internet]. No date [cited 2014 Feb 16]. Available from: http://www.kadry.ru/articles/detail.php?ID=24400 (In Russian).
  7. Gancherenok I.I. Creativity as an integrating element for key competencies “life-long education”. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. 2009; (5): 22-28. (In Russian).
  8. Zimnyaya I.A. Key competencies as an efficiency target basis of competency approach to education. Moscow: IC for problems of quality of specialist training; 2004. 40 p. (In Russian).
  9. Ivanov D.A., Mitrofanov K.G., Sokolova O.V. Competency approach to education. Moscow: Academy of advanced training of education personnel; 2003. 101 p. (In Russian).
  10. Kasprzhak A.G. The problem of choice: elective courses in school. Moscow: Novaya shkola. 2004. 160 p. (In Russian).
  11. Mogilevkin E.A., Novrogorod A.S., Klinikov S.V. HR-tools: practical assessment. How to identify the employees who can provide the best result: training and practical manual. St. Petersburg: Rech’; 2012. 320 p. (In Russian).
  12. Education: a hidden treasure. The key issues of the Report of the International Commission on education for XXI century. [Internet] [cited 2014 Mar 02]. Available from: http://www.ifap.ru/library/book201.pdf (In Russian).
  13. Raven J. Competency in a modern society: identification, development, and implementation [transl. from Eng.]. Moscow: Cogito-Center; 2002. 396 p. (In Russian).
  14. Rankin N. Definition of the concept of “competency” [transl. from Eng.]. [Internet] [cited 2014 Jan 30]. Available from: http://www.hr-portal.ru/article/opredelenie-ponyatiya-kompetentsiya (In Russian).
  15. Sinyakova M.G. The main approaches to defining general cultural competency of a bachelor of management. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimental'nogo obrazovaniya. 2010; (9): 23-36. (In Russian).
  16. Whidet S, Hollyfrod S. Guidelines on competency [transl. from Eng.] Ìoscow: GIPPO, 2008. 228 p. (In Russian).
  17. Choshanov M.A. Flexible technology of the problem and module training. Moscow: Narodnoe obrazovanie; 1996. 160 p. (In Russian).
  18. Shadrikov V.D. New model of a specialist: innovation training and a competency approach. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. 2004; (8): 26-31. (In Russian).
  19. Shishov S.E., Agapov I.G. Competency approach in training: whimsy or a necessity? Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii. 2002; (2): 58-62. (In Russian).
  20. Shmidt V.R. Problems in the technology of personnel assessment: training and methodical manual. St. Petersburg: Rech'; 2008. 160 p. (In Russian).
  21. Chi M.T.H. Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In: The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press; 2006. P. 21-30.
  22. Dall'Alba G, Sandberg J. Unveiling professional development: a critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research. 2006; (3): 383-412.
  23. Sandberg J, Targama. A. Managing understanding in organizations. London: Sage; 2007. 217 p.

Views: 23534

Be first to comment this article

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Comment:

Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Monday, 01 December 2014 )
< Prev   Next >
home contact search contact search