|
A.E. Chirikova1,2, E.A. Tarasenko1
1National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Moscow
2Institute of Sociology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
Abstract. In Western countries governments actively
cooperate with professional medical associations to improve quality of
medical care. In Russia issues related to responsibility for monitoring
medical competence that could be delegated to medical associations are
still being actively debated by the professional community. Today,
medical associations compete with each other for selecting direction to
follow to ensure positive changes in the Russian healthcare. Competition
of the bidders for the leading position weakens associations and makes
the possibility of their cooperation as required by the rules of the
game rather questionable.
The aim of the study is to determine potential
readiness of professional medical associations to take on new functions
for ensuring professional development of doctors as well as
possibilities of their cooperation with the state to improve
professional competence of doctors.
Methodology. The study was conducted using a
qualitative technique: method of in-depth interview. Overall we
conducted 25 in-depth interviews with heads of leading medical
associations, physicians representing different regions and leading
experts in the sphere.
Results and conclusions. The state is required to
invest in people and those techniques that will allow medical
associations to move forward towards improving professional competence
of doctors. Sequential actions are required for step-by-step assumption
of new functions by associations. Governmental objective control over
such activity of medical associations is necessary as well. Failure of
leaders of professional medical associations to come to agreement among
themselves could be overcome by adopting clear rules of the game which
could be offered by the state.
Keywords: professional medical associations; provision
of professional development of doctors; self-regulation of professional
activities of doctors; the National Medical Association.
References
- Mansurov V. Yurchenko O. Russian doctors : professionalization top
or self- occupation? In: Anthropology professions or unauthorized entry
is permitted. P.V. Romanova, E.R. Yarskaya –Smirnova, editors . M. 2011
P.171- 187. (In Russian).
- Krasnopol'skaya I. Mind Commerce. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. Number 5082. (3 ) 2010. January 13. (In Russian).
- Prysiazhniuk D. Sobiray E. New contours of social relations in the
field of professional employment. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya.
2010; 9:138. (In Russian).
- Popova I.P. Professional Association: Trends in Western sociology
research professions. In: Professionals in the reform era: the dynamics
of ideology status and values. VA Mansurov, editor . Moscow: ISRA;.
2013. P. 64- 66. (In Russian).
- Roshal L. Just be honest work. Business Russia. 2013 October; 152 (10): 75. (In Russian).
- Brennan T.A., Horwitz R.I., Duffy F.D., Cassel C.K., Goode L.D.,
Lipner, R.S. The role of physician specialty board certification status
in the quality movement. JAMA. 2004; 292(9): 1038-1043.
- Dalsing MC. Industry working with physicians through professional medical associations. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2011 Sep; 54(3 Suppl): 41-46
- Fakih M.G., George C., Edson B.S., Goeschel C.A., Saint S.
Implementing a national program to reduce catheter-associated urinary
tract infection: A quality improvement collaboration
of state hospital associations,academic medical centers, professional
societies, and governmental agencies. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2013 October; 34 (10): 1048-1054.
- Freidson E. Professional powers. A study of institutialization of formal knowledge. University of Chicago press, 1986. Page 187.
- Halliday T. Beyond monopoly: Lowers, state crises, and professional empowerment. The University of Chicago Press, 1987. XIII.
- Hawkins R., Lipner R.; Ham H.; Wagner R., Holmboe E. American Board
of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification: Theory and
Evidence Regarding the Current Framework. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2013; 33 (S1): 7-19.
- Heart E. Relations between professional medical associations and
healthcare industry, concerning scientific communication and
continuing medical education: a policy statement from the
European Society of Cardiology. Revista portuguesa de cardiologia: orgão
oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Portuguese journal of cardiology. 2012 July; 31 (7-8): 529-538.
- Holmboe E. Maintenance of Certification, Revalidation, and Professional Self-Regulation. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2013; 33 (S1): S63–S66.
- Lannon, C.M., Peterson, L.E.Pediatric collaborative networks for quality improvement and research. Academic Pediatrics 2013 November; 13 (6 Suppl): S69-S74.
- Lipner RS, Hess BJ, Phillips RL Jr. Specialty board certification in the United States: issues and evidence. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2013; 33 (S1): 20-35.
- Macdonald K.M. The sociology of the professions. London: Sage publications; 1995. 240 p.
- Meyers L., Gibbs D., Thacker M., Lafile L. Building a telehealth
network through collaboration: The story of the Nebraska statewide
telehealth network. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly. 2012 October; 35 (4): 346-352.
- Schofferman J.A., Eskay-Auerbach M.L., Sawyer L.S., Herring S.A.,
Arnold P.M., Muehlbauer E.J. Conflict of interest and professional
medical associations: The North American Spine Society experience. Spine Journal. 2013 August; 13, (8): 974-979.
- Shaw J.S., Norlin C., Gillespie R.J., Weissman M., McGrath J. The
national improvement partnership network: State-based partnerships that
improve primary care quality. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2013; 33 (S1): 10-19.
Views: 20226
|
