About this Journal Publication ethics Editorial Board Editorial Council Editorial Office For the Authors Contacts

News feeds

Journal in Databases

eLIBRARY.RU - ═└ËÎ═└▀ Ţ╦┼╩Ďđ╬══└▀ ┴╚┴╦╚╬Ď┼╩└

Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Main arrow Archive of previous Issues arrow ╣4 2014 (38) arrow State and professional medical organizations: who can really ensure professional development of doctors in Russia?
State and professional medical organizations: who can really ensure professional development of doctors in Russia? Print
Monday, 01 September 2014

A.E. Chirikova1,2, E.A. Tarasenko1
1National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Moscow
2Institute of Sociology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.

Abstract. In Western countries governments actively cooperate with professional medical associations to improve quality of medical care. In Russia issues related to responsibility for monitoring medical competence that could be delegated to medical associations are still being actively debated by the professional community. Today, medical associations compete with each other for selecting direction to follow to ensure positive changes in the Russian healthcare. Competition of the bidders for the leading position weakens associations and makes the possibility of their cooperation as required by the rules of the game rather questionable.

The aim of the study is to determine potential readiness of professional medical associations to take on new functions for ensuring professional development of doctors as well as possibilities of their cooperation with the state to improve professional competence of doctors.

Methodology. The study was conducted using a qualitative technique: method of in-depth interview. Overall we conducted 25 in-depth interviews with heads of leading medical associations, physicians representing different regions and leading experts in the sphere.

Results and conclusions. The state is required to invest in people and those techniques that will allow medical associations to move forward towards improving professional competence of doctors. Sequential actions are required for step-by-step assumption of new functions by associations. Governmental objective control over such activity of medical associations is necessary as well. Failure of leaders of professional medical associations to come to agreement among themselves could be overcome by adopting clear rules of the game which could be offered by the state.

Keywords: professional medical associations; provision of professional development of doctors; self-regulation of professional activities of doctors; the National Medical Association.


  1. Mansurov V. Yurchenko O. Russian doctors : professionalization top or self- occupation? In: Anthropology professions or unauthorized entry is permitted. P.V. Romanova, E.R. Yarskaya ľSmirnova, editors . M. 2011 P.171- 187. (In Russian).
  2. Krasnopol'skaya I. Mind Commerce. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. Number 5082. (3 ) 2010. January 13. (In Russian).
  3. Prysiazhniuk D. Sobiray E. New contours of social relations in the field of professional employment. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya. 2010; 9:138. (In Russian).
  4. Popova I.P. Professional Association: Trends in Western sociology research professions. In: Professionals in the reform era: the dynamics of ideology status and values. VA Mansurov, editor . Moscow: ISRA;. 2013. P. 64- 66. (In Russian).
  5. Roshal L. Just be honest work. Business Russia. 2013 October; 152 (10): 75. (In Russian).
  6. Brennan T.A., Horwitz R.I., Duffy F.D., Cassel C.K., Goode L.D., Lipner, R.S. The role of physician specialty board certification status in the quality movement. JAMA. 2004; 292(9): 1038-1043.
  7. Dalsing MC. Industry working with physicians througháprofessionalámedicaláassociations. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2011 Sep; 54(3 Suppl): 41-46
  8. Fakih M.G., George C., Edson B.S., Goeschel C.A., Saint S. Implementing a national program to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infection: A quality improvement collaboration ofástateáhospitaláassociations,academicámedicalácenters,áprofessional societies, and governmental agencies. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2013 October; 34 (10): 1048-1054.
  9. Freidson E. Professional powers. A study of institutialization of formal knowledge. University of Chicago press, 1986. Page 187.
  10. Halliday T. Beyond monopoly: Lowers, state crises, and professional empowerment. The University of Chicago Press, 1987. XIII.
  11. Hawkins R., Lipner R.; Ham H.; Wagner R., Holmboe E. American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification: Theory and Evidence Regarding the Current Framework. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2013; 33 (S1): 7-19.
  12. Heart E. Relations betweenáprofessionalámedicaláassociations and healthcare industry, concerning scientific communication and continuingámedicaláeducation: a policy statement from the EuropeanáSocietyáof Cardiology. Revista portuguesa de cardiologia: orgão oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Portuguese journal of cardiology. 2012 July; 31 (7-8): 529-538.
  13. Holmboe E. Maintenance of Certification, Revalidation, and Professional Self-Regulation. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2013; 33 (S1): S63ľS66.
  14. Lannon, C.M., Peterson, L.E.Pediatric collaborative networks for quality improvement and research. Academic Pediatrics 2013 November; 13 (6 Suppl): S69-S74.
  15. Lipner RS, Hess BJ, Phillips RL Jr. Specialty board certification in the United States: issues and evidence. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2013; 33 (S1): 20-35.
  16. Macdonald K.M. The sociology of the professions. London: Sage publications; 1995. 240 p.
  17. Meyers L., Gibbs D., Thacker M., Lafile L. Building a telehealth network through collaboration: The story of the Nebraska statewide telehealth network. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly. 2012 October; 35 (4): 346-352.
  18. Schofferman J.A., Eskay-Auerbach M.L., Sawyer L.S., Herring S.A., Arnold P.M., Muehlbauer E.J. Conflict of interest and professional medical associations: The North American Spine Society experience. Spine Journal. 2013 August; 13, (8): 974-979.
  19. Shaw J.S., Norlin C., Gillespie R.J., Weissman M., McGrath J. The national improvement partnership network: State-based partnerships that improve primary care quality. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2013; 33 (S1): 10-19.

Views: 19398

Be first to comment this article

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.

Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Thursday, 04 September 2014 )
< Prev   Next >
home contact search contact search