DOI: 10.21045/2071-5021-2018-59-1-1

Contacts: Pogodina Vera, e-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Information about authors:
Pogodina Vera Aleksandrovna, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1738-3859
Babenko Anatoliy Ivanovich, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6652-7903
Khaiatova Zulfiia Bezarbekovna, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3284-9810
Babenko Evgeniy Anatolyevich, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6973-1002
Acknowledgments. The study did not have sponsorship.
Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Significance. An adult life consists of main stages, during which certain functions are being performed. With age changes and disturbances in health affect the level of realization of the priority functions.

Purpose. To compare health indicators of people aged 18-29, 30-44, 45-59 and 60-70 years according to medical records for 2015-2016 in the city of Novosibirsk.

Material and methods. The study compared data on characteristics of physical development and pathologies obtained from the statistical registration forms (No. 025/y-04; No. 025-12/y; No. 131/y) for 2015-2016. Representative, randomized and strato-metrically selected sample included a total of 1100 patients aged 18-29, 30-44, 45-59 and 60-70 years.

Results. The older the contingent age, the smaller the share of people with normal indexes of physical development. In older age groups the leading diseases included diseases of the female genital organs and diseases of the male genital organs. In young and middle ages the study identified people without any diseases but with low or high risk of chronic diseases (5.2 - 30.0%). Adults aged 18-29 had an acute pathology of moderate severity (30.8-50.0%). People aged 30-44 had acute diseases of mild and severe severity and needed follow-up (2.4 - 52.4%). In the young age group there were people with chronic diseases of mild severity and required medical examination (48.4-50.0%). The middle age group included people with chronic diseases of moderate severity, requiring high-tech medical care (34.8-87.6%). The elderly and old ages included people with only chronic diseases of mild (55.0 and 27.7% respectively), moderate (5.0 and 25.3% respectively) and severe severity (40.0 and 47.0% respectively) and people under medical follow-up.

Conclusions. All age groups had a significant share of patients with imbalances in physical development. The main pathology across all ages was similar, while its characteristics were determined by the specific features of each age.

The scope of application. The identified deviations from the Russian age norms in health can serve basis for developing options of a comprehensive health assessment of the adult population by age and region.

Key words: physical development; pathology; adults 18-29 years, 30-44 years, 45-59 years 60-70 years.

References

1. Bant'eva M.N., Prilipko N.S. Vozrastnye aspekty zabolevaemosti vzroslogo naseleniya po obrashchaemosti v ambulatorno-poliklinicheskie uchrezhdeniya [Age aspects of morbidity in the adult population assessed by reference to outpatient clinics]. Sotsial'nye aspekty zdorov'ya naseleniya [serial online] 2013 [cited 2015 Sep 11]; 4 (32). Available from: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/774/30/. (In Russian).
2. Mikhaylova Yu.V., Korotkova A.V., Lisitsyna M.M. Sravnitel'nyy analiz problem i prioritetov razvitiya zdravookhraneniya sub"ektov Cevero-zapadnogo federal'nogo okruga Rossii i osnovnykh napravleniy strategii partnerstva «Severnoe izmerenie» v oblasti obshchestvennogo zdravookhraneniya i sotsial'nogo blagopoluchiya [Comparative analysis of the problems and priorities of healthcare development in the North-West Federal District of Russia and the main directions of the Northern Dimension partnership strategy in the field of public health and social well-being]. Sotsial'nye aspekty zdorov'ya naseleniya [serial online] 2013 [cited 2017 Aug 19]; 4 (32). Available from: http: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/493/30/lang,ru/ (In Russian).
3. Mezhdunarodnaya statisticheskaya klassifikatsiya bolezney i problem, svyazannykh so zdorov'em. Desyatyy peresmotr [The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Tenth revision]. Moscow: Meditsina. 1995; 170 p. (In Russian).
4. Ob utverzhdenii poryadka provedeniya dispanserizatsii otdel'nykh grupp vzroslogo naseleniya [On approving the procedure for clinical examination of individual groups of the adult population]. Prikaz Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 3 fevralya 2015 goda ¹ 36an. [Online] [cited 2018 Jan 11]. Available from: https://www.rosminzdrav.ru/documents/8542. (In Russian).
5. Tribunskiy S.I., Kolyado V.B., Kolyado E.V., Dorofeev Yu.Yu., Leshchenko V.A. Tipologiya sub"ektov Sibirskogo Federal'nogo Okruga na osnove kompleksnoy otsenki zdorov'ya naseleniya, zdravookhraneniya i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Typology of subjects of the Siberian Federal District on the basis of a comprehensive assessment of population health, healthcare, and socio-economic development]. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal 2011; 4-1(26):176-178. (In Russian).
6. Chazov I.E., Oshchepkova E.V., Zhernakova Yu.V. Diagnostika i lechenie arterial'noy gipertonii. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii [Diagnosis and treatment of arterial hypertension. Clinical recommendations]. Kardiologicheskiy Vestnik 2015; 1: 5-6. (In Russian).
7. Shabunova A.A. Zdorov'e naseleniya v Rossii: sostoyanie i dinamika: monografiya [Population health in Russia: the state and dynamics. Monograph]. Institut sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya territoriy Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Vologda. 2010; 176 p. (In Russian).
8. Shvetsov A.G., Shvetsov D.A. Otsenka fizicheskogo zdorov'ya vzroslogo naseleniya [Assessment of physical health of the adult population]. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2012; 5: 54-56. (In Russian).
9. Department of health and social services. The White House: 2012 National Report quality of Health Care / the Agency for healthcare research and quality. USA. 2013, 224 p. [Online] [cited 2014 Sep 11]. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/.
10. Feeny D, Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Farland BH. Comparing population health in the United States and Canada. Population Health Metrics 2010; 8:8.
11. Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, Singer J, Chan A, Mâsse LC, et al. Comparing the content of participation instruments using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2009; 7:93. (doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-93).
12. Taylor J, Price K, Braunack-Mayer A, Haren MT, McDermott R. Intergenerational learning about the preservation of health: regional quality of Australian research. Oxford Journals Medicine Health International 2014; 29(2):361-368.
13. Vozikis À, Drivas Ê, Milioris Ê. Health literacy among university students in Greece: determinants and association with self-perceived health, health behaviours and health risks. Archives of Public Health 2014; 72:15. (doi:10.1186/2049-3258-72-15).

Write Comment

Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article. Personal verbal attacks will be deleted. Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed. Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button. Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Comment:
Code:*