About this Journal Publication ethics Editorial Board Editorial Council Editorial Office For the Authors Contacts
English

News feeds

Journal in Databases

eLIBRARY.RU - ÍÀÓ×ÍÀß ÝËÅÊÒÐÎÍÍÀß ÁÈÁËÈÎÒÅÊÀ

Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Main arrow Archive of previous Issues arrow ¹3 2011 (19) arrow Urogenital diseases in municipal population of the Republic of Bashkortostan and local demographic variability
Urogenital diseases in municipal population of the Republic of Bashkortostan and local demographic variability Print
Friday, 30 September 2011

Summary. Population of the Republic of Bashkortostan to Jan.1, 2009 reached  app. 4,057,000 persons, of which 40.6% persons has been rural inhabitants. This rural population reside 40 rural municipal local districts (MLD) and 13 mixed rural-urban MLDs. In the mixed type, town is usually an administrative center. Mixed MLDs have all-in-all 20 towns, 8 of them are by themselves considered as urban administrative locality.

Every MLD had officially presented statistical data on adult population morbidity for urogenital diseases (UGD). Average annual values were calculated in this study  for primary and total (primary+secondary) morbidity for these diseases in every MLD for the years 2002-8. Summarized values for 12 MLDs for primary and total morbidity were also calculated. Along these values, 12 MLD were ranged in order of elevation of the morbidity.

Resulting elevated rates of growth of UGD in MLDs are partly accounted for by epidemiologic situation rendering to be much more elucidated with realization of National Priority Project “Health”, activation of preventive work, introduction of additional screening of population.

Average 7-annual (2002-2008) values of adult population UGD morbidity in MLDs were calculated for the purpose of comparative analysis. These 7-annual values were calculated for primary and total morbidity, and also for various nosology forms.

Analysis of these values demonstrated wide range variability between MLDs as concerns primary and total morbidity, as well as the structural morbidity along nosology patterns. However, these variability was actually a discrepancy, accounted for by loose use of strict criteria in registration activity, lack of physicians with this certified specialty, availability variations of medical social  care for population of various MLDs.

Working and living conditions, environmental ambience, natural and climatic factors also played certain roles in these variability.

Wide range variability, if not discrepancy, necessitates further prospective studies for real prevalence of UGD here, involving more adequate general analysis of primary registry and more detailed selective samples analysis of this registry for correction of certain general data.

Key words. Rural healthcare, municipal local districts, urogenital diseases.

References

  1. Yevsyukov A.A. Mediko-demograficheskiye i organizatsionnyye osnovy meditsinskoy pomoshchi selskomu naseleniyu v sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh [Medical demographic and organizational foundations of medical care to rural population under present economic conditions] [PHD. Thesis]. Ì. 2010. 49 p.
  2. Yevsyukov A.A., Sharafutdinova N.H., Kalininskaya A.A. Mediko-demograficheskiye pokazateli zdorovya selskogo naseleniya v Respublike Bashkortostan [Medical demographic indicators of health state of rural population in the Republic of Bashkortostan]. Ufa: Zdravookhranenyie Bashkortostana; 2010. 198 ñ.
  3. Kalininskaya A.A., Stryuchkov V.V., Yevsyukov A.A., Kudryavtsev A.A. Mediko-demograficheskiye osobennosti selskogo naseleniya [Medical demographic peculiarities of rural population]. Vestnik Vserossiyskogo obshchestva spetsialistov po mediko-sotsialnoy ekspertize, reabilitatsii i reabilitatsionnoy industrii 2010;(2):97-101.
  4. Lisitsyn Yu.P. O kontseptsii strategii okhrany zdorovya naseleniya Rossii [On the conception for the strategy of health protection of the population of Russia]. Common health and public health in 21st century. Conference of chair heads of common health and public health. Ufa: DesignPolygraphService; 2006. P. 10-15.
  5. Maksimova T.M., Gaenko O.N. Zdorovye naseleniya i sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye problemy obshchestva [State of health of the population and social economic problems of society]. Problemy sotsialnoy gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny 2003;(1):3-7.
  6. Maksimova T.M., Lushkina N.P. Mediko-demograficheskiye pokazateli i ikh tendentsii v Rossii i nekotorykh stranah mira [Medical demographic indicators and tendencies of their changing in Russia and some other countries of the world]. Byulleten natsionalnogo nauchno-issledovatelskogo instituta obshchestvennogo zdorovya 2005;(7):15-19.
  7. Medik V.A., Kiryanov B.F. Podkhody k prognozirovaniyu pokazateley zdorovya naseleniya [Approaches to prognosis-making on indicators of health state of the population]. Problemy sotsialnoy gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny 2005;(6):3–5.

Views: 20104

Be first to comment this article

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Comment:

Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Thursday, 13 October 2011 )
< Prev   Next >
home contact search contact search