About this Journal Publication ethics Editorial Board Editorial Council Editorial Office For the Authors Contacts
English

News feeds

Journal in Databases

eLIBRARY.RU - ÍŔÓ×ÍŔß ÝËĹĘŇĐÎÍÍŔß ÁČÁËČÎŇĹĘŔ

Google Scholar

Google Scholar

For authors' attention

Publication is free of charge

In aims to provide interconnection of publications in international scientific journals using Digital Object Identification - DOI, our editorial office incorporated the journal "Social aspects of population health" into international reference system CrossRef.

Since 2016 DOI will be assigned to all scientific articles published in our journal free of charge.

Also DOI will be assigned to all articles published in 2014 and 2015 free of charge as well
Main arrow Archive of previous Issues arrow ą6 2013 (34) arrow Role and value of workshop to train specialists in working with online information resources to analyze and evaluate scientific work
Role and value of workshop to train specialists in working with online information resources to analyze and evaluate scientific work Print
Friday, 27 December 2013

A.I. Vyalkov1, S.A. Martynchik1, E.A. Glukhova1, V.A. Polesskiy1, A.S. Bastron1, V.G. Zaporozhchenko2, E.L. Potyomkin1, E.B. Marochkina1, G.P. Marochkin1
1I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow
2Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow

Abstract. The study is substantiated by the need to address a problem of developing specialists to work with online information resources and adjust to work environment and tools of information support of an organization. This reflects social demand for improved performance in the domain of science and education.

The aim of the study was to determine the role and purpose of the workshop “Science Online: online information resources for science and education” to manage training of researchers in developing practical skills to work with national and international scientific citation databases to increase indicators of publication activity of the authors and institutions. The article covers methodological aspects related to the use of bibliometric approaches and evaluation indicators for analysis of publication activity and citation of authors of scientific papers as well as research and educational institutions, optimization of work with national and international scientific citation indexes, instruments and services.

The authors propose for discussion context and workshop’ scope of work, , training package, working program of the specialists’ training module and its thematic blocks that show capabilities of the informational analytical systems, instruments and services for objective display of publications in scientific citation databases, systemization and analysis of publication activity of researchers of scientific institutions.

The article presents contextual novelty of the program related to systemization of knowledge and skills, improved competence of users in the sphere of information technologies, increased workforce proficiency of research institutions. The article shows that the role and purpose of the workshop are to improve the level and traffic of informational exchange within the research community; to develop high-performance communication instruments and related analytical and statistical studies on wide range of indicators; to increase competence and qualification level of researchers and competitive advantages of research and development institutions; and to optimize science management.

Keywords: workshop; online information resources; information and communication technologies; information analysis systems; publication activity; research and educational institution.

References

  1. Vyalkov AI, Kucherenko VZ, Martynchik SA, Glukhova EA. Methodological bases for quality management of medical research organization activity in a competitive environment. Problemy upravleniya zdravookhraneniem. 2010; 53: 14-19. (In Russia).
  2. Vyalkov AI, Martynchik SA, Polesskiy VA. Methodological bases for standardization of assessment activity of medical research organization. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2010; (6): 3-7. (In Russia).
  3. Vyalkov AI, Martynchik SA, Glukhova EA, Polesskiy VA, Potemkin EL. Testing of the model of rating assessment of the efficiency for organizations carrying out the research work in “Public health and healthcare management” Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2011; (6): 7-11. (In Russia).
  4. Vyalkov AI, Glukhova EA.Design of the quality management system for medical research activity: a unified technology to improve processes. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012; (3): 3-6. (In Russia).
  5. Vyalkov AI, Glukhova EA, Potemkin EL. The procedure and conditions for the use of stimulating payments that enhance the efficiency of research and innovation activity. Materiały VIII Międzynarodowej naukowi-praktycznej konferencji «Wykształcenie i nauka bez granic – 2012». Volume 30. Medycyna: Przemyśl. Nauka i studia - str.10-14. (In Russia).
  6. Vyalkov AI, Glukhova EA. Quality assessment of research activity in medical organization with using scientometric indicators. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2013; (3): 3-5. (In Russia).
  7. Vyalkov AI, Glukhova EA, Potemkin EL. Measurement approaches and tools for assessing a research and innovation potential. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2013; (1): 8-11. (In Russia).
  8. Vyalkov AI, Glukhova EA. Quality management and information and communication technologies as a tool to attract resources to universities. In: Materiály IX mezinárodní vědecko-praktická konference «Dny vědy- 2013»- Dil 28. Lekarstvi: Praha. str. 7-10. (In Russia).
  9. Glukhova EA. Scientific and methodological basis for monitoring and indicators to assess the research activity in “Public health and health care”. Materiały VII Międzynarodowej naukowi-praktycznej konferencji «Perspektywiczne opracowania są nauką i technikami - 2011». Volume 39. Medycyna.: Przemyśl. Nauka i studia - str. 70-72. (In Russia).
  10. Glukhova EA, Galustova LR, Potemkin EL. Development of an analytical system for monitoring human potential of medical research organization. Problemy standartizatsii v zdravookhranenii. 2012; (9-10): 22-28. (In Russia).
  11. Glukhova EA. Monitoring of processes and assessment of efficiency of research activity. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012; (5): 7-10. (In Russia).
  12. Gokhberg LM, Gorodnikova NV, Gracheva GA. Indicators of science, Moscow: The State University. Higher School of Economics; 2011. 368 p. (In Russia).
  13. Gokhberg LM, Zaichenko SA, Kitova GA, Kuznetsova TE. Science policy: global context and Russian practice. Moscow: The State University. Higher School of Economics; 2011. 310 ń. (In Russia).
  14. Glybochko PV, Svistunov AA, Nikolenko VN, Loginov BR. Strategy for development of innovation system “Electronic information resources” for medical training and higher education science. Meditsinskoe obrazovanie i vuzovskaya nauka. 2013; 1 (3): 20-26. (In Russia).
  15. Il'menskaya EM. Tools for monitoring and examination of scientific results of scientists’ activity. Kontseptsii. 2009; (1): 111-115. (In Russia).
  16. Kalabukhova GV, Glukhova EA. Quality management as a tool to mobilize the resources of university. Materiali za IX-a mezhdunarodna nauchna praktichna konferentsiya. Naynovite postizheniya na evropeyskata nauka – 2013. Tom 11. Pedagogicheskie nauki. Sofiya. «Byal GRAD-BG» OOD. P. 61-66. (In Russia).
  17. Kitova GA. The state scientific institutions: contours of the forthcoming reform. Forsayt. 2010; (3): 40-54. (In Russia).
  18. Kurakova NG, Tsvetkova LA, Aref'ev PG. Publication activity as a tool for monitoring research strategies in medicine. Meditsinskoe obrazovanie i professional'noe razvitie. 2011; (2): 18-26. (In Russia).
  19. Kurakova NG. Rating of medical universities in Russia and the world. Menedzher zdravookhraneniya 2012; (7): 48-55. (In Russia).
  20. Kurakova NG, Tsvetkova LA, Aref'ev PG. New tools for analysis and prognosis of research strategies in global science. Naukovedcheskie issledovaniya. 2012; (12): 65-86. (In Russia).
  21. Kucherenko VZ, Martynchik SA, Bashkina EM. Citation in science and a role of electronic resources and assessment tools. Problemy upravleniya zdravookhraneniem. 2009; (3): 14-21. (In Russia).
  22. Kucherenko VZ, Martynchik SA, Bashkina EM. Russian citation index and assessment of research efficiency. Ekonomika zdravookhraneniya. 2009; (8): 26-32. (In Russia).
  23. Kucherenko VZ, Martynchik SA, Glukhova EA. Self-assessment of medical research organization activity as a tool for planning improvements. Ekonomika zdravookhraneniya. 2010; 150: 9-13. (In Russia).
  24. Kucherenko VZ, Martynchik SA, Glukhova EA. Expert assessment and quality indicators to assess the activity of medical research organizations specialized in “Public health and health care management”. Problemy upravleniya zdravookhraneniem. 2010; 5: 24-29. (In Russia).
  25. Markusova VA. Bibliometry as a methodological and tool basis for monitoring of development and information provision of Russian science: [dissertation]. Moscow; 2005. 434 p. (In Russia).
  26. Martynchik SA, Galustova LR, Glukhova EA. Analytical system for assessing the efficiency of medical research organization activity. Materiály IX miedzynárodwej naukowi-praktycznej konferencji. «Europejska nauka XXI powieka-2013». Volume 23. Medycyna.: Przemysl. Nauka I studia. – str. 23-28. (In Russia).
  27. Mokhnacheva YuV, Kharybina TN. The methods to determine the significance of scientific publications. Bibliosfera. 2008; (3): 28-33. (In Russia).
  28. Polozov AA. Rating of higher education institutes: evolution and problems. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. 2011; (2): 85-89. (In Russia).
  29. Starodubov VI, Kuznetsov SL, Kurakova NG, Tsvetkova LA. Representation of publications of RAMS scientists in WEB of Science: assessment of current indicators and prospects for their increase. Vestnik RAMN. 2012; (9): 59-64. (In Russia).
  30. Starodubov VI, Kurakova NG, Tsvetkova LA, Markusova VA. On the new criteria to assess Russian academic and university science. Meditsinskoe obrazovanie i professional'noe razvitie. 2011; (1): 16-23. (In Russia).
  31. Starodubov VI, Kuznetsov SL, Kurakova NG, Tsvetkova LA, Aref'ev PG, Ivanov AV, et al. Publication activity of Russian medical science in the focus of actual research policy: assessment of attainability of target indicators. Vestnik RAMN.. 2013; (3): 8-14. (In Russia).
  32. Shaybakova LF, Rozhkova MA. Assessments of efficiency of research, technical research and innovation activity. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Economic University; 2007. 384 p. (In Russia).
  33. Yakhnina BC, Tsygankov DB. Formation of a system for assessment and monitoring the efficiency of research activity as a condition to improve an innovation potential of Russian science. In: Pivovarov YuS, editor. Tendencies and prospects for development. A yearbook. Issue 2. Moscow: Institute for Scientific Information on Social Sciences of RAS; 2007.P. 622-625. (In Russia).
  34. Vialkov AI, Gluhova EA. Monitoring processes and procedures for measuring the quality of the organization's scientific work specializing in "Public health and health care". Materiali za VIII mednarodna nauchna praktichna konferentsiya, "B"deshchite izsledvaniya"- 2012. –Tom 28. Lekarstvo. Biologii. Khimiya i khimicheskaya tekhnologii. Sofiya. "Byal GRAD-BG ÎÎD". P. 41-45. (In Russia).
  35. Vyalkov AI, Glukhova EA, Petushkova JY. The potential of information-analytical system science index for the analysis of publication activity and rating of medical research organization. Nauka i Studia. Medycyna. Biologia. 2013; 18(86): 39-43. (In Russia).
  36. Costas R, Bordons M. The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. J. Inform. 2007; 1 (3): 193-203.
  37. Franceschini F, Maisano D. Structured evaluation of the scientific output of academic research groups by recent h-based indicators. 2011; 5 (1): 64-74.
  38. Kucherenko VZ, Tatarnikov MA, Gluhova EA. The mechanism of self-assessment of scientific research organization for measuring the compliance of processes with the principles of quality management system. Nauka i Studia. 2012; 3(48): 101-105. (In Russia).
  39. Levitta J, Thelwallb Ě. A combined bibliometric indicator to predict article impact. Inform. Proces. Manag. 2011; 47 (2): 300-308.
  40. Loginov BR, Glukhova EA, Zaporozhchenko VG, Potemkin EL. The capabilities of information-analytical system science index for the analysis of medical journals rating by specialization. Nauka i Studia. Medycyna. Biologia. 2013; 18(86): 17-22. (In Russia).
  41. Retzera V, Jurasinskib G. Towards objectivity in research evaluation using bibliometric indicators -A protocol for incorporating complexity. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2009; 10(5): 393-400.

Views: 10645

Be first to comment this article

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Comment:

Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Thursday, 16 January 2014 )
< Prev   Next >
home contact search contact search