About this Journal Publication ethics Editorial Board Editorial Council Editorial Office For the Authors Contacts

News feeds

Journal in Databases


Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Main arrow Archive of previous Issues arrow 5 2011 (21) arrow Assessment of the wtp threshold for qaly by contingent valuation method for medical care and treatment
Assessment of the wtp threshold for qaly by contingent valuation method for medical care and treatment Print
Thursday, 19 January 2012

O.V. Zelenova
Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics of Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation, Moscow

Summary. The first trial in Russia. Analysis of threshold willingness-to- pay for quality adjusted life year in Russia is a very urgent and serious matter. Methods of willingness-to- pay investigation are different for various countries and depend on development of Health Care system. We have estimated willingness-to- pay method of Contingent valuation and proved that the results vary from other countries. Submitted data shows payment dedications and demands of our people for goods and services in medical care.

We have held the opinion poll to define the willingness to pay for quality adjusting life year. Average willingness-to- pay self and willingness-to- pay self5 are rather equal 69 000 and 72 000 rubles (the rub/$ rate in Russia is 30 rub for 1 $). The average willingness-to- pay fam is 16% more than willingness-to- pay self. The fact that willingness-to- pay fam was higher than willingness-to- pay self suggests that altruistic utility is larger than the respondents perceived value of one QALY gained for themselves, at least in the case of health care for a family member. Average willingness-to- pay soc is 146 000 rubles that is twice over WTPself5 (72 000 rubles). The fact that willingness-to- pay soc exceeded willingness-to- pay self may be explained by altruistic motivation in people who were led to offer a healthcare payment to individuals in need. WTP value is increasing sequentially from willingness-to- pay self to willingness-to- pay soc in each category of questionnaire. The main factors which had huge impact are occupation, age and education. Whereas factors such as gender, hospitalization (within the last 5 years) and hospitalization of any member of household (within the last 5 years) didn`t played an important role.

Key words: Willingness to Pay, threshold, Quality Adjusted Life Year, Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.



  1. Alekhina G.A. Klassifikatsiya osnovnykh kontseptsiy otsenki chelovecheskoy zhizni [Classification of the basic conceptions for assessing a persons life]. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomika. 2007;311(6):119-123.
  2. Baraz V.R. Korrelyatsionno-regressionnyy analiz svyazi pokazateley kommercheskoy deyatelnosti s ispolzovaniyem programmy Excel. [Correlation regressive analysis of interrelations between indicators of business activity with using the Excel program]. Yekaterinburg: Federalnoye agentstvo po obrazovaniyu GOU VPO UGTU − UPI, 2005. 102 p.
  3. Berezin I.C. Marketingovyye issledovaniya. Kak eto delayut v Rossii. [Marketing study. How it is done in Russia]. Moscow: Vershina. 2005. 432 p.
  4. Zdravookhraneniye v tsifrakh [Healthcare in figures]. Menedzher zdravookhraneniya 2010;(11):6, 16.
  5. Sayenko L. Zhurnal Forbes nazval samyye dorogiye lekarstva v mire [The Forbes magazine named the world most expensive drugs]. RIA Novosti. 23.02.2010. [Internet]. [cited 2010 Nov 16]. Available from: http://www.rian.ru/society/20100223/210436974.html
  6. Figueras J, McKee M, Lessof S, Duran A, Menabde N. Sistemy zdravookhraneniya, zdorovye i blagosostoyaniye: Otsenka argumentov v polzu investirovaniya v sistemy zdravookhraneniya [Healthcare systems, health and well-being: assessing arguments in favor of investing in healthcare systems]. WHO. 2008.
  7. Spisok stran po VVP (PPS) na dushu naseleniya [The List of countries by Gross domestic product per capita]. Vikipediya. [cited 2011 Sep 12]. Available from: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%VF%D0%V8%D1%81%D0%VE%D0%VA_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%V0%D0%VD_%D0%VF%D0%VE_%D0%92%D0%92%D0%9F_%28%D0%9F%D0%9F%D0%A1%29_%D0%VD%D0%V0_%D0%V4%D1%83%D1%88%D1%83_%D0%VD%D0%V0%D1%81%D0%V5%D0%VV%D0%V5%D0%VD%D0%V8%D1%8F
  8. Yagudina R.I., Kulikov A.Yu., Nguyen T. Opredeleniye poroga gotovnosti platit v Rossii, v Yevropeyskikh stranakh i v stranakh SNG [Evaluation of a threshold for payment willingness in Russia, European countries, and CIS countries]. Farmakoekonomika 2011;4(1):7-11.
  9. George B, Harris A, Mitchell A. 2001. Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996). Pharmacoeconomics 2001(19):1103-1109.
  10. Gyrd-Hansen D. Willingness to pay for a QALY. Health Economics. 2003(12):1049-1060.
  11. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economi evaluations /Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1992.146:473-481.
  12. Kaplan RM, Bush JW. Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychology 1982(1):61-80.
  13. Value based pricing for NHS drugs: an opportunity not to be missed? /Claxton K, Briggs A, Buxton MJ, Culyer AJ, McCabe C, Walker S, Sculpher MJ. British Medical Journal 2008;336:251-254.
  14. What is the price of life and why doesn't it increase at the rate of inflation? /Ubel PA, Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Fendrick AM. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003;163:1637-164.
  15. Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: in search of a standard /Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Miller E, Fendrick AM, Weissert WG. Medical Decision Making 2000;20:332-342.
  16. Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: implications for societal health care resource allocation /King J T, Tsevat J, Lave JR, Roberts MS. Medical Decision Making 2005;25:667-677.

Views: 19054

Comments (2)
1. 04-06-2015 00:54
? ? ? - , - ?
Written by ( This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it ) (Guest)
2. 05-07-2014 19:55
, , , , . . ,
Written by ( This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it ) (Guest)

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.

Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Thursday, 07 November 2013 )
< Prev   Next >
home contact search contact search